Subscribe to Dissident Vox
Support the Open Rights Group podsafe music network
Tally ho!
British Blogs.
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
View Article  The Sacrificed King?



Tests supervised by the Italian Army on a Carcano M91/38 bolt-action rifle, similar to the one said to have been used by Lee Harvey Oswald to kill President John Fitzgerald Kennedy (JFK), on November 22, 1963, claim that it would have taken at least 19 seconds to get off the three shots allegedly fired by Oswald.The Warren Commission, (responsible for the investigation into the murder), concluded that the shots which killed JFK, were fired by Oswald in only 7 seconds.

The report, was published by the Italian news agency ANSA and has since been picked up by United Press International (UPI) and reported briefly on Sky News. It is sketchy on details, claiming only that "The tests were done in a former Carcano factory in Terni." and that "In one test, a bullet was fired through two large pieces of meat to simulate the assumed path of a shot that the Warren Commission concluded struck Texas Gov. John Connally after passing through Kennedy's body. In the test, the bullet ended deformed, while the bullet in the Kennedy assassination remained intact."



Comment

It is strange that this report should appear in the same week that Time Magazine is running a piece on its website claiming that JFK's brother, Robert Francis Kennedy, (RFK) assassinated in June 1968, was "America's first J.F.K. assassination-conspiracy theorist." In the case of RFK, the man said to have been responsible for the murder, Palestinian Christian Sirhan Sirhan, has since retracted his admission of guilt and demanded a retrial, claiming that he was framed and that crucial evidence was destroyed.

75% of the American people believe that John Kennedy was killed by an organized conspiracy. A conspiracy which did not involve Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone. These days that belief is simply used as proof of the American peoples delusional desire to believe ill of their own government.

Lee Harvey Oswald was charged with the murder of JFK, but was himself murdered two days later by Jack Ruby before he could stand trial. Oswald famously claimed that he was not responsible for the murder and was in fact "a patsy". The Warren Commission concluded Oswald had acted alone. The House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded in 1979 that there may have been a conspiracy. Nothing was ever done to follow up on this conclusion.

In the murder of JFK and its subsequent controversial aftermath, America became the victim of it's very own killing of the king ritual. An act, replete with tortured symbolism, which traumatized an era and enacted a profound shift in the psychic topography of American political life.

America was never the same after the death of JFK. The murder of his brother Robert; when he himself was campaigning to inherit the symbolic crown of the presidency, simply reinforced the terrible sense of helplessness that many Americans were beginning to feel. During an era of international war and internal strife, many desired a real change in the political and social culture of the Republic. It had looked (for a time), as if the Kennedy's; a newly crowned virile family dynasty would help to bring this change about.

After the assassinations, much of that idealism and hope was lost beneath the bodies of dead leaders and the endless carnage of a conflict in Vietnam.  If there was a conspiracy to kill the Kennedy's and its end was to prevent the flowering of idealism into a genuine force for cultural and political transformation, then these two vile acts of sorcerous symbolism, could not have met with a greater degree of success.
Keywords: , , , , ,
View Article  All Hail President Blair?



With just 10 days left on the clock of his Prime Ministerial reign, Anthony Charles Blair is preparing to attend his final EU summit. It is expected that whilst in Germany on Thursday, Blair will give assent to plans for Britain to sign up to the "treaty on the functioning of the union" a document that many claim, is simply a repurposed version of the failed European Constitution. The original constitution was signed by EU leaders including Tony Blair in October 2004 - its ratification failed, when it was rejected by both the French and Dutch people in referendums in 2005.

Todays Sunday Times, quotes Monsieur Valerie Giscard d’Estaing, former French President and one of the amended treaties principal architects as saying. "The name is not important". Speaking to the French newspaper LeMonde, he said the public would "adopt, without knowing it, the proposals that we dare not present to them directly”. The same Monsieur Giscard, revealed his true feelings about the European public's rejection of the previous version of the constitution in a lecture at the London School of Economics in 2006, when he said. "The rejection of the Constitution was a mistake which will have to be corrected."

This remodeled version, ratifies the European Union as a single legal entity with a "legal personality" allowing it to negotiate and sign binding international contracts and agreements. It confers upon this legal entity "exclusive competence" and determines that Member States may "exercise their competence to the extent that the Union has not exercised, or has decided to cease exercising, its competence." It also creates a position of European President within the European Council and a single foreign policy representative. Many constitutional experts feel this will erode the principle of national sovereignty and deal a significant blow to the power of nation states to govern themselves. The document states emphatically. "This Constitution shall have primacy over the laws of member states".

According to the Sunday Times, EU leaders have already discussed the idea of offering the new position of European President to Blair; a role which will undoubtedly carry significant prestige and no small measure of power. Given the legal primacy that the European Parliament assumes over all national governments this could effectively elevate Blair to an even higher level within the European elite.

UPDATE: Blair has sidestepped the European Presidential role, instead opting to take up a position as a special envoy for the Middle East Quartet with a portfolio focused on Palestinian economic reform.


 Comment

It is plain that when the democratically expressed will of the people is not to pursue a path towards deeper European integration, those who consider themselves the only ones fit to decide, will consider such decisions "mistakes" to be ignored, corrected later, or treated as a temporary setbacks.

Of the 16 countries that have completed ratification, only 2 have done so via referendum; Luxembourg and Spain. Spain managed only a 42% turnout in its vote. France and Holland both rejected it. In all other cases, the Constitution was ratified by parliamentary vote and the people were not consulted.

The European Constitution has been rejected by half of the people who have actually had a chance to vote upon it; the fact that this means nothing to those pushing ahead with a mildly revised version, perfectly demonstrates the contempt the European political elite feel for the desires of those in whose name they pretend to govern.


Read a PDF reader friendly version of the Constitution here.
how to subscribe
This Month
June 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Year Archive
podsafe music network Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. UK podcasting at its best - britcaster.com
www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from dissidentvox. Make you own badge here.
Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)