An interview with a group of solicitors protesting in Islington against planned reforms to the Legal Aid system.

They argue that these 'reforms' will force legal aid solicitors out of business; dramatically affect defendants access to the legal advice of their choice and diminish the quality of legal representation in court.



MP3 File

In part one of a two part show, Dissident Vox examines the paradigm of metaphysical naturalism and looks at the occult roots underlying the tree of modern science. He examines the influence of Sir Francis Bacon and asks what early role the secret brotherhoods of Rosicrucianism and Freemasonry played in the path to ascendancy of the scientific worldview.

Introduction
Metaphysical Naturalism - Definition 
Music : Ensemble Vermillion - 'Stolen Jewels' - Sonata III (Adagio) 

The Invisible College/The Royal Society 
Sir Francis Bacon  Biography/Resources
Baconian evidence for Shakespearean authorship 
Bacon, Shakespeare & the Rosicrucians
Baconian Ciphers 
The New Atlantis 

Robert Moray
Sir Christopher Wren 
Elias Ashmole

The Fraternity of the Rose and Cross
Fama Fraternitatis
Confessio Fraternitatis
Conclusion

For those of you not paying attention, the BBC have followed last weeks inhospitable reception to a blog post by BBC World's head of news, Richard Porter, with a further unpopular posting by the same gentleman.

In the previous article, Mr. Porter propounded what one reader referred to as an "oops my dog ate my homework" argument, in which he claimed, that the BBC had lost all of its transmission tapes of the televised news output from the BBC World channel for the date September 11th 2001.  This unfortunate "error" was compounded, when clips of that same output magically appeared all over the web. These clips, showed the BBC reporting the collapse of the Salomon Brothers building (WTC7) some twenty-four minutes before the actual event occurred.

So far, so bizarre. We have the BBC engaging in a seeming act of news clairvoyance, followed by one of archiving incompetence, both of which seem to require some considerable further explanation. Cue blog post number two, courtesy of Mr. Porters latest article, the unimaginatively titled, 'Part of the Conspiracy? (2).'

This time Mr. Porter lays out a further response, in which the collapse of Building 7 (due to fire) is portrayed as an inevitable event and the BBC (and other news organisations) early reporting of this fact, merely one in which they jumped the proverbial gun after being reliably informed of the soon to occur event. However, Mr. Porter somehow fails to specify who the source of this advance information about the buildings imminent collapse was.

Equally, he does not bother (in the interests of objectivity) to mention the mound of evidence, first-responder and eyewitness testimony from the day of September 11th, which others claim leads to the conclusion that WTC7 did not collapse as a result of fire, but was instead brought down by a controlled demolition.  I invite you to study this video as merely one example supporting those particular viewpoints.
 
Mr. Porter refers to those questioning the official version of events on 9/11 as "fantasists". An assertion which might not appear so disingenuous, if it were not seen to be coming from the editor of a news channel, that has just demonstrated itself to have a somewhat less than straightforward ability to report the 'facts' as they occurred on the day of September 11th 2001.

The story itself is still non-existent within the mainstream news media, but continues to bubble away online, attracting a range of strong (mostly anti-BBC) opinion. This particular story comes after many in the 9/11 truth movement have claimed that the BBC's recent 9/11 documentary was heavily slanted in favour of the offical narrative and portrayed those expounding alternative theories as delusional.

---

Comment

Personally, I don't pretend to have a conclusive list of ingredients in what looks like an increasingly murky informational soup, nor do I pretend to know who is actually cooking the dish. At this point however, it does seem, that what we are being fed, does NOT taste like the truth!

Something just isn't right with this particular heady brew which sees the BBC implicated by some, in producing a series of biased and slanted reports on the events of September 11th and the 9/11 truth movement denounced as crackpots, lunatics, nuts and liars by others. Then again, something has been terribly wrong with the world for a long time, September 11th was merely the day that fact became tragically apparent to the world in general.

Some forum sources are now speculating that the parties responsible for 'breaking' this particular 'news story' are themselves part of a wider disinformation campaign; responsible for throwing false bait out to the truth-seeking masses, diverting investigation off on wild tangents that will only help reinforce negative conclusions and generally reinforcing the cultivated prejudice of many in the middle-ground of public opinion that the "tin-foil hat brigade" are simply not to be trusted.

Others wonder, whether the whole 9/11 event is not designed to serve a much darker purpose. Even darker than that of dragging us all into a prolonged, increasingly bloody and borderless war, where totalitarian measures predominate, morally blurred methods of coercion and torture prosper and only endless erosions of civil-liberties can guarantee our safety. 

In this scenario,  9/11 is an intentional planned misdeed, an informational and cultural cancer, with an aggressive growth rate and an exposure date timed in. It is an information virus, gradually dispersing throughout the body politic of society; spreading distrust and suspicion into all areas of civil and social life; eroding confidence in the survival of the existing social order, leading to widespread psychological and social pathology, conflict, division and ultimately, a desire to radically reform the existing world order altogether.

This in itself an interesting theory, yet appears far outside the comprehension range of the average person attempting to pick through the maze of information and disinformation still swirling around the smoke-filled psychological and physical ruins of that day. What can conclusively be said about this particular news story right now, or indeed about 9/11 in general? What is in fact provable, to the satisfaction of the vast majority of people, in such a way that few are left in doubt as to the veracity of the truth presented before them?

Nothing that's what, absolutely ground zero...

9/11 is a moral maze. Everything that has arisen from it has only deepened the sense of division, suspicion and speculation. Wherever it is leading, whoever is behind it, 9/11 is proving to be a continuing malignancy, a parasite poisoning the host body of the culture in which it lives and one in which the cure, may very well prove almost impossible to facilitate without the death or dismemberment of the patient.